New Yellow Card Rule & No More “Groups Of Death”
I dare say, this UEFA clan is getting a bit more reasonable under Michele Platini.
The first item they tackled was the yellow card issue. Previously yellow cards were wiped after the group stage only, meaning if a player picked up a warning in the quarterfinal and semifinal, it’d be no go for the final. Now, yellow card slates are wiped clean after the group stage and quarterfinals. So the only way a player can possibly miss the final is to be suspended or sent off in the semifinal.
Sounds logical, does it not? Takes a bit of power away from the refs and leaves the best players on the pitch. I’m sure everyone - players, coaches and fans alike - are pleased with these developments.
Next on the docket? Deal with the issue of the dreaded “Group of Death”. (See: Group C) Perhaps this one is a bit less fan friendly, because for those who aren’t fans of Italy, France, Netherlands and Romania, I’m sure it’s wonderful to watch those four teams kick the crap out of each other over six games. For the fans of those countries? Not so much.
The way they’ll tackle this is by eliminating friendlies from the formula deciding the UEFA coefficient which in turn decides the seeding of the groups. So the only thing that matters are games that matter. Again, makes sense.
All in all, good work from UEFA here. And somewhere Sepp Blatter is ignoring all of this.
Related Posts
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
|
Comments


I completely disagree with Platini and you. Neither of these decisions are good for football.
When I started reading about the ‘Yellow Card’ issue, I expected UEFA to not clean the slates at all anymore…and was surprised to see that they decided for the complete opposite. The fact that it will be virtually impossible to be suspended for a game due to yellow cards will make the game meaner and harder. I don’t mind the hardness bit…but you’ll see a lot more tactical fouls, a lot more diving, a lot more arguing, etc. That’s not what we should strive for in the game. If somebody is so unfair that he manages to pick up multiple cards in 4 games, he should be rightfully suspended for a game.
As for the ‘groups of death’. This is the EC, to win it, you’ll have to get past the densest quality of teams possible. If you can’t deal with the heat, you don’t deserve to win it. The only thing that rigging the groups would achieve is to make it more difficult for smaller teams to progress. That is an unfair advantage for the ‘big’ teams. You shouldn’t be considered big JUST because you are Italy or Germany or France. You have to prove yourself every cup again - if need be against three strong teams in the group phase. (Also, remember: the teams are already put in groups according to their strength at the draw. So that disadvantage already exists.) If we keep favoring the big teams we a) end up with the same winners forever and b) will eventually allow the big teams direct access to the cup. Big nono. Football is a competitive sport and it doesn’t matter whom you’re up against: you have to find a solution to get past them.
Posted from
Australia




There’s no way to win a Euro without proving yourself. But tournaments worldwide are staged by drawing from seeded pools, with the strongest in a pool together. Smaller teams, like Greece and Turkey can still get through, but they have to do the job in the group stage. Actually, for some mid-tier teams, this would be better. In a more classic seeded tournament, Romania would never have to face France, Italy and Holland in their three group stage matches. THAT’s unfair.




i dont think they will be able to completely eliminate tough groups in the future…its just not possible




One of the big problems of this draw was that neither of the co-hosts was a strong team. Switzerland ranks 48th and Austria ranks 101st. When you toss those two teams into the top pot with the defending champ, who is also not one of the top four teams, you’re going to get skewed results in a tournament with only sixteen teams. With two weak co-hosts, there’s still the fairly strong possibility of a Group O’Death.
The friendly thing is a step in the right direction, but it won’t entirely keep this from happening again.
Posted from
United States




And whilst he’s making sure the big countries get easier draws in the Euro, Michel Platini is shouting out that the Champions’ League format is unfair because it favors big teams in the group stage, since the best 8 clubs can’t play against each other, nor can clubs of the same country (he wanted to make it obligatory that after the group stage clubs of the same country would face off…), and that two far weaker clubs are sure to be in the group…
Sounds like Mr Platini needs to choose. Either he wants “little” clubs and countries to have a better chance of succeding, in which case taking friendlies into account is a good thing (after all, friendlies are only 2-3 games a year, so they’re not going to make a major impact of FIFA Rankings), or he wants the “big” ones to have a more direct route to the final, meaning that groups of death must be avoided, player punishment mecanisms must be avoided (well, yes, because if a “big” country loses its best player on a third yellow card, it’s a handicap for the “big” country)…
Posted from
France




I am not sure the issue is eliminating groups of death, but rather eliminating stupidity like friendly games determining seeding.
Secondly, I agree with the comment above that two hosts in the tournament is a farce. This is a small tournament and opening two spots takes away somebody else’s spot. I think EC should be hosted by a single country in principle.
And the fact that the hosts are seeded! This is probably one of the most absurd things in soccer tournaments. As a result we ended up with a stronger pot 2 than pot 1 for this year’s cup.
On the yellow cards, I think you can make arguments both ways. But it needs to be consistent. I’d say either get rid of yellow card suspensions alltogether or carry them throughout. I’d personally prefer the latter but the key is not making any game more important than others. You can’t get into the final without getting out of the group.
Posted from
United States




Friendly games shouldn’t count because they’re friendly.. They’re used to test players, try different tactics.. You can’t say the level of play a team produces during a friendly game is representative of their true level.
Furthermore, coaches should be able to chose their friendly games without taking the UEFA coefficient into consideration.
I don’t think it’s a question of favoring the big teams here.
Having one very strong group in any competition is not necessarily a good thing for small teams, considering there’s small teams in that group that will have a lower chance to pass than same-level teams in other groups. Randomness like that doesn’t seem fair to me.
Posted from
France




I also like the Yellow card decision.
One the one hand, if they carried the yellow card count for the whole competition, wouldn’t there be some abuse with “fake” yellow cards just to miss a not-so-difficult game? For example some big teams could do that to purge their yellow cards during the quarter finals. Only a luxury big teams could afford, boohoo!
On the other hand, the current system puts to much stress on the semi-final.. Players are scared by the yellow card and don’t play at their full potential. Of course it’s their fault for having a yellow card in the first place, but it’s hard for defensive players to avoid being late on a tackle and take one.
Posted from
France




The yellow card should not be abandoned from the quarter finals to the finals in any tournament. If a player disrespects or ignores the rules of the game he should be punished. Now divers, loud mouths and dangerous takles will be part of the game.
Posted from
Germany




Sporel: That is nonsense. Hosting an EC is a fairly big financial investment. If only one country is allowed to host the event, it will eventually only the the four big European leagues (England, Italy, Spain, Germany) plus maybe France, who can afford to host a cup. That would be boring - and a repetitive home advantage.
As for the seeding, if they want to have seeding, then it’s normal that the host(s) and the defending champion get a spot. Either they keep it this way…or get rid of the seeding altogether. Just constantly protecting the big teams is wrong. And as free bet points out: there will always be tough groups, especially in the EC.
And as for Switzerland being ranked 48th in the world…that is only because they couldn’t play any A-games over the last 2 years, as they didn’t have to qualify. I believe Switzerland was ranked 12th after the World Cup.
Posted from
Australia


Comments are closed
Send Your Tips!
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org
Euro 2008 Club Football News
- USOC Third Round Results: Revenge of the Minnows
- Offside Rewind: You'll Believe You Can Fly
- Daily Dose: July 3rd, 2009
- Corinthians Get Some Good PR, Learn How To Celebrate & Andre Santos Has Snoop Dogg Bling
- Transfer Talk: What's Plan F Again?
More Euro 2008 Blogs
Austria World Cup Blog
111 Articles | 117 Comments
Croatia World Cup Blog
179 Articles | 1,755 Comments
Czech Republic World Cup Blog
196 Articles | 319 Comments
France World Cup Blog
759 Articles | 9,061 Comments
Germany World Cup Blog Blog
469 Articles | 2,980 Comments
Greece World Cup Blog
134 Articles | 60 Comments
Italy World Cup Blog
517 Articles | 19,495 Comments
Netherlands World Cup Blog
1,833 Articles | 21,137 Comments
Poland World Cup Blog
312 Articles | 2,957 Comments
Portugal World Cup Blog
432 Articles | 6,574 Comments
Romania World Cup Blog
78 Articles | 281 Comments
Russia World Cup Blog
68 Articles | 118 Comments
Spain World Cup Blog
228 Articles | 1,852 Comments
Sweden World Cup Blog
151 Articles | 318 Comments
Switzerland World Cup Blog
216 Articles | 327 Comments
Turkey World Cup Blog
37 Articles | 289 Comments
UEFA Euro 2008 Championships
546 Articles | 7,250 Comments
Monthly Archives
World 







