Vote: Should the Euros be Expanded?
Reuters has reported that UEFA will decide sometime this year whether to expand the European Championships to either 20 or 24 teams. Since this is UEFA and not FIFA, there is a tiny little chance that the will of the fans won’t be completely ignored, so tell us what you think about expanding the Euros? Is it only fair, with all the new countries splitting off in Europe, or does it dilute a tournament that is so great for the fact that it is so exclusive?
Tell us what you think.
As for me, I have to say I’m dead set against it. As much as it would bring me great personal joy to see Scotland qualify for the Euros more regularly, which would be more likely in a 24-team system, it would mean less. Even though teams like Greece and Poland didn’t perform at a high level in the tournament, there were no bad teams at Euro 2008, and I think this year’s tournament is a great example of why 16 is a perfect number. It makes qualification a meaningful process, where perennial Euro teams like England are not assured of successful entry, and where teams like Italy and France can be pushed to the edge of elimination.
I’m a big fan of this tournament’s format, and happen to think it’s the most competitive international football tournament in the world. I’m looking forward to hearing your thoughts on the matter.
Related Posts
Subscribe
|
Print
|
Share
|
Comments


Problems I can immediately see
1. More games would make more tired legs for the next season.
2. More boring group stage games.
3. Longer tournament, less interest.
4. Will there be enough venues for all these games?
5. Five man groups gives a day off for certain teams making an unfair advantage in the following match.
6. Would put too much pressure on the home country to be able to have the capacity to entertain so many fans from so many countries.
7. England might qualify
Posted from
United States




NO WAY!!! What’s the point of qualifiers then?




If anything should be changed, its the seeding. Who think Scotland might have had a chance to advance from group C? I certainly do. The qualifiers need changing, not the finals.
Posted from
United States




If there are going to be two co-hosts then I’d like to see the total number of teams increase. To have one eighth of teams automatically qualify feels wrong.
Only question is whether the European football schedule can accommodate a longer tournament.
Wonder if I’d feel the same had England qualified…
Posted from
United Kingdom




Make it 20. Nobody watches qualifiers outside of Europe.




There are two schools of thought:
1) Europe has the best teams and with the burgeoning quality of the ex Eastern bloc countries, we should open it up to more countries.
2) Money talks and we miss all the English monies. Also we do not want hear the flack about 2 hosts any longer.
I love it just the way it is, but I am not totally against expanding it.




Ridiculous.
Posted from
Netherlands




I don’t know Lugo, they certainly had my interest.
Posted from
United States




Also an idea, what if when there are two co-hosts ( Austria/ Switzerland, Ukraine-Poland in 2012) they play a two leg aggregate series for the spot, how entertaining would that be?
Posted from
United States




Ryan: that is a great idea !!
but expanding the finals would eventually deminish the overall quality of the tournament (and put extra strain on the players). Not that UEFA (and FIFA) necessarily care about that, they’re only interested in the mulah !




I think it’d be pretty good just to have 20. The tournament just seems so short, and this year there were a lot of surprises, having a few more “dark horses” could make it even more interesting.
Posted from
United States




So far, 68% for keeping it as it is. Couldn’t agree more.
Posted from
United States




Make it 20. Having the likes of England, Scotland, Denmark and Ukraine only brings more competition to the table, it wont hurt it. More teams = more fans = more money spent = economy happy. Also, if this trend of co-hosting continues, then I’d hate the fact that technically only 14 teams battled for a spot.
So yes, please change it to 20 teams.
Posted from
Canada




I think it should stay at 16, but the cohosts shouldn’t be getting first and second seed!
Posted from
United States




No, it should be kept as it is. The density makes it different from WC and what’s so special about.
Posted from
Germany


Comments are closed
Send Your Tips!
Email tips[at]worldcupblog[dot]org
Euro 2008 Club Football News
- Offside Rewind: You'll Believe You Can Fly
- Daily Dose: July 3rd, 2009
- Corinthians Get Some Good PR, Learn How To Celebrate & Andre Santos Has Snoop Dogg Bling
- Transfer Talk: What's Plan F Again?
- Michael Owen To Sign With Manchester United. (Yes, You Read That Correctly.)
More Euro 2008 Blogs
Austria World Cup Blog
111 Articles | 117 Comments
Croatia World Cup Blog
179 Articles | 1,755 Comments
Czech Republic World Cup Blog
196 Articles | 319 Comments
France World Cup Blog
759 Articles | 9,061 Comments
Germany World Cup Blog Blog
469 Articles | 2,980 Comments
Greece World Cup Blog
134 Articles | 60 Comments
Italy World Cup Blog
517 Articles | 19,492 Comments
Netherlands World Cup Blog
1,832 Articles | 21,117 Comments
Poland World Cup Blog
312 Articles | 2,957 Comments
Portugal World Cup Blog
432 Articles | 6,574 Comments
Romania World Cup Blog
78 Articles | 281 Comments
Russia World Cup Blog
68 Articles | 118 Comments
Spain World Cup Blog
228 Articles | 1,851 Comments
Sweden World Cup Blog
151 Articles | 318 Comments
Switzerland World Cup Blog
216 Articles | 327 Comments
Turkey World Cup Blog
37 Articles | 289 Comments
UEFA Euro 2008 Championships
546 Articles | 7,250 Comments
Monthly Archives
World 







